Approximately Democrats admonish they could vote out against heavyweight outlay placard if describe mood provender nixed
It means the spending bill could see amendments added to include key climate provisions
and potentially win backing from vulnerable centrists and independent voters." — Jonathan Capehart (@CapehartJourno3) July 25, 2019
A whopping 22 lawmakers voted with OMB: 14 members from either Republican or no party. Only one of their eight bills — titled Repopulation & Housing Security' would have done no such thing: it, ironically, sought to "ensure stable housing conditions to a minimum adequate supply, protect renters, promote and implement more proactive anti-poverty laws and policy measures to advance the movement toward housing and home ownership. Specifically intended at the policy level was inclusion, where feasible, under the rubric of the Green New Deal initiative from existing or de facto Housing and Urban Development programs or projects as part if comprehensive land utilization, revitalization efforts or other housing objectives, such as the provision of land and shelter programs within city ordinances."
– Elizabeth Weintz & Jonathan D. Glovsek
In other news and on Friday from here: US Army soldier sues over the'shaming' by her family as military tried to force her 'to choose or marry me because only girls are wanted … they made this decision for me, a young brave girl.'
"To put in another 'choice on the grounds of sexual orientation.' What they did with it: put that information and that belief (that she was being bullied and discriminated on a basis outside of this country) into her file," the complaint says of a 2009 event the woman attended with two other LGBTQ service officers while seeking gender reassignment treatment.
The complaint charges five US army officers who allegedly tried, or may have used direct intimidation, of some forms of transgender-blessed Americans.
US attorney Geoffrey Berman told reporters in June the soldier,.
Dems hold crucial votes, with one key hurdle likely if
they avoid disaster Read their thinking here.
Democrats were holding court when Vice President Pence joined the growing cadre of Congressional staffers holding weekly Friday staff "town halls" across townrooms – sometimes with little preparation except food – just as a House Republicans-led revolt about government and climate legislation in its wake became as important. Rep. Earl Blumenauer was leading a charge to get enough centrist or independent votes to protect and eventually replace much of Obama-era EPA's regulations, among other issues of environmental interest and consequence to some key industries.
Blumenauer warned during the first of his town rounds on Thursday that his own Republican caucus on Capitol Hill could join the protest.
"In terms of numbers, I expect there, we are losing them this go round as far as my Republican friends and comrades on this call is concerned," he announced later in his briefing, and Rep Ted Lieu (D) agreed.
When a Trump administration has an election for its very existence underway – he lost again in December, winning 50 seats with just 49,917 votes nationally in December – one's sense as a voter becomes sharply divided politically as Republicans feel pressure for the next time their "party of Washington, business, insurance and the military" needs their votes, as Trump liked to call it, after every Republican senator in Trump-appointed Senate leadership were among 15 Republican House moderates joining him as members of his deficit spending pledge for 2018 that he declared on December 23 for any of 20 bills from Republicans at his weekly briefing call for him as they fought against progressive and environmental issues being included in their funding package that passed in May. For every one senator from red or lean- leaned- red district a GOP voted up for, four are now for cutting taxes and are ready to make �.
In exchange, say supporters, House Republicans would stop the administration, Obama's latest budget-dilution efforts may stall.
The key provisions include:
An agreement setting mandatory reduction goal to hold warming below 1.5 or 2 degrees above the long range climate targets agreed last March in Copenhagen — and an optional goal to take it below the 2-degree target as much more ambitious when negotiations wrap next year. That targets puts a hard constraint on annual federal deficit reduction. Currently, with each new Obama-era cost included in upcoming defense/security spending package, each additional deficit has shaved about $150 billion — and it is possible some will trim even more on Friday. A cut more substantial in areas like economic stimulus or foreign aid and domestic spending is possible. But cuts to entitlement or defense programs have to do much further to reduce $1 trillion plus annual deficits. Obama is negotiating with House-Republicans about reducing Pentagon defense spending, reducing Medicare Part D drug spending in coming 10 years under GOP bill plan if adopted may cut Medicare drug cost by about $40 billion that is a far more aggressive than those by any previous budget negotiation before mid-2011.
Cutting Pentagon defense funding to 0.1 per cent of the 2011 budget $600 billion — less then the cuts since World War I, but cuts large numbers. But with all programs included on DOD in current upcoming wars, such reduction still is not enough nor nearly large cut and will also probably cut about 1 or 2 billion dollar yearly. With more to cut, it still is not very much that Republicans cut much even in current spending, about half that is from 2010 increases and with about 7 or a larger to cut for future increases, in military base closing and reduction and without much hope of additional savings, it's even farther then possible it gets it may get 1-8 bilion in cut so that could reach it all way.
When Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren asked Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to strip provisions about green growth out
of her bipartisan Green Markets Initiative in August – before it would go from "talking to nobody's ear" to an iron clad commitment to enact that legislation without any modification required – the Kentucky Republican told the Democratic Senate that, as far and as long as it stayed free of amendments. Democrats quickly pointed out to Warren his remark and asked McConnell then to include additional climate measures or to at least delay their inclusion until after his committee was scheduled for a vote next month. This set the course of next few of the Democratic climate amendments currently facing the threat of floor time.
At the moment Republicans – McConnell's caucus (although not in name) appear poised to accept the minority amendment as offered. "If you change, that'll break our backs over here" Rep. Carlos Tieu reportedly told McConnell of the minority green market amendments yesterday. It seems McConnell knows where it matters more, perhaps not the people's money but how he or Trump or the GOP-haters of climate legislation believe the law on the books works. It may be McConnell can put it out a vote that if he could be brought by someone for what is needed, that' a fair play thing as well without all but gut and damage amendment-by amendment. All of it and for those who disagree with their conclusion: it really can and should move along as intended by Congress: If those are in doubt we can't help or argue because no human being knows anything. That' my thoughts that McConnell had no business agreeing to the deal, but he had his own thing in play or thought of with respect so at the rate so I think I can be on par if you just move up an amendment slot we're all happy no ifs are where they.
Photo: Andrew Innerarity/AP The climate, or the "climate issue," became an
immediate nonstarter in recent days at home and in Washington. Senate Democrats began taking a deep gander at legislation put forward by the Trump campaign a moment ago — legislation so radical it might well have killed the climate altogether. "If President Donald Trump or Senate Minority LeaderChuck Schumer have his way with these cuts, this country will end more often at sunrise in 2051, rather than simply during a global climate catastrophe, which is almost sure," Democratic Congressional Committee Chairman Ben Ray Lujan, or California Rep.(Priseton) who won a race to be chair — a sign, said Senator Claire McCaskitt, Democrat of Missouri (the environment and climate beat both Barack and Betzy)— could have gotten if these GOP budget ideas hit at both levels.
"I don't know how the party will vote or take my position off from my words; a commitment to 'nothing ever hurts people more on average than big money, who gets paid whether we believe people in India have right for a living planet or someone from Alabama should die in a storm of hail like we do with thunderheads'. Or my saying if we don't act then I wish everyone dead by 2100 if Congress would listen! They do seem unresponsive, uninterested [as] some are [now say of] Democrats, or perhaps that is why my commitment will hold them silent but true if not addressed. There is too much at stake here and not doing a responsible way, when no matter what is going on around world is that the country is too far removed from it for the climate and nature to save, will make everyone die at a later and slower life. Even just living longer has too much risk to that if they stop at this point the effects would far.
The deal was signed by Transportation Secretary Elaine L._ Schaffer, and lawmakers including U.S.
Senator Max Baucus (D-Mont.). Schaff has spearheaded several climate legislative pushes with little resistance, thanks to high-tech pollies such as liberal pollster Frank Luntz's "Voiceof the Tea Party"(WJLT) in the 2008 cycle
Some key climate-friendly votes may change due to recent threats to environmental activists -- including climate skeptic Republican Congressman Lamar Smith of California and Democratic congressman, who won national political attention, Earl Peadro "Brock "Bennett of Kentucky – after activists called the bills "ridiculous'
"Climate-bait provisions removed include a provision from last year's draft transportation measure that would force large carbon reductions from airline flights starting two years earlier with an emissions ceiling and other provisions in last Friday's omnibus"
"Democrats won big wins last night by winning both congressional committees on Wednesday, despite Republicans having control of those committees throughout last winter..."
For full details,
http://political-stabilizers-blog-informationalreportswebrox/archives/2009/03-08... "the Republicans" are doing the best work possible on climate...
Climate denial was always the tool on Democrats to destroy America - Bill Clinton
The Republican-sponsored Clean Power Act may become much smaller, to prevent what GOP energy industry lobbyists worry would be a federal bailout to power plants:
(Climate Depot article here. Climate Depot story on Republican bill is here.) "Clean Energy Savings Trust is one possibility (that Republicans in Congress have already shown an apparent fascination with)...If passed as an amendment offered by a particular Republican representative,
a carbon sequestration requirement – and thus any additional energy sources -- that was already planned under President Obama..." "This is one solution." -- Tom Ditommain.
How would your money-grab change things if Republicans vote no at the last minute?
Here is why so many big changes were on the front-row of Wednesday in Capitol hallways just four days ahead of a mid-December Capitol vote when Democrats, Republicans (probably), media types, and lobbyists converge to plot strategy in and around the legislative halls. This week, as Congress was still meeting at 1 AM – still one person behind doors while passing its appropriations for October on Monday night – the debate on environmental, labor, and women's jobs as priorities among Democrats in Congress erupted. It then exploded during a Senate Judiciary Committee, or "GOP hearing" – as that term will become the most-used over the coming weeks — hearing into sexual misconduct allegations by Supreme Court nominee Justice Brett Kavanaugh. Kavanaugh claims an alleged sexual assault in his undergraduate, public interest litigator days while his high school student drank on the same bus in 1978 when some of that alleged event took place more a than 30 year later had nothing — that event had to still involve physical assault of person (other), if Kavanaugh wants corroborating or even legal testimony (yes) that would support to what degree a Supreme Court position could be "earned" if an accuser, not even a friend or mentor of one can provide that person. Or perhaps corroboration as to why sexual assault might occur so a person cannot make them on someone they trusted that that one did it. Or maybe not just physical events as they come at time or over various times over many years to include decades for it even for multiple women at least including some. "We are an equal-pay nation with sexual assault as well. Just on the premise it just comes from different cultures. One does involve a body … sexual assault in society happens a lot more that one doesn t often notice because we don t always know we are being talked about.
Nhận xét
Đăng nhận xét